| 11/09/2007
Foot and Mouth outbreak was a 'self-inflicted wound'
UK Government has some serious questions to answer
The Foot and Mouth outbreak in Surrey could and should have been
avoided, says Conservative MEP for Wales Jonathan Evans.
The Conservatives will be asking the European Commission, reporting
on Foot and Mouth in the UK tomorrow (Wednesday), to comment on
the Institute for Animal Health (IAH) continuing as a European Community
reference laboratory for Foot and Mouth, bluetongue and Swine Vesicular
Disease, given the biosecurity breaches that were allowed to occur
at Pirbright in Surrey last month.
Earlier this year, Professor Martin Shirley of the IAH told MPs
he was trying to run a Rolls Royce service, but was being "funded
at the level of a Ford Cortina".
UK farmers, Mr Evans said, deserve targeted compensation from the
Government and a full in-depth investigation into who was warned
about biosecurity concerns and who ignored them.
He said:"The Foot and Mouth outbreak appears to have been a
self-inflicted wound.
"The Institute for Animal Health recently said it was trying
to run a Rolls Royce service funded at the level of a Ford Cortina.
How could such an important global facility become so poorly maintained?
"If people have been reporting concerns about biosecurity
at the plant and they have been ignored, whoever ignored them should
be brought to account. We also need to know whether any Ministers
ever knew about the biosecurity concerns and what action they ordered.
"The European Commission relies on Pirbright as an EU reference
laboratory and I imagine they would be horrified to hear the levels
of biosecurity there were so poor.
"The government's reaction to this outbreak was considered
to be adequate, but once again it seems penny-pinching has resulted
in significant hardship for British farmers. Farmers deserve compensation
for the loss of earnings, inconvenience and distress that could
and should have been avoided."
back to news
page |